

I chose a picture from when I went hiking with my boyfriend Bryan and our husky, Boris. The nature was very beautiful and I thought the picture was funny because Boris is walking right beside me. The picture originated from the Salado Creek Greenway, where we went walking the other day. It was manipulated by changing the hue and the saturation, as well as the lighting. I also inserted a picture of a dinosaur and used the magnetic lasso tool in order to crop it to enter it into the picture. It was manipulated because I wanted to bring out the colors in the forest, accentuate the dinosaur by changing the lighting effects and focusing on him, and I was pointing in the original picture at nothing, so I thought it'd be fitting to put in a picture of some sort to draw the eyes to it. The manipulation was not harmful, just fun, unless people are traumatized by the thought of flying dinosaurs. The picture really didn't relate to the article, because the article I found mainly talked about photo manipulation in the newsroom, and the common public wouldn't think twice to believe this picture!!
I thought the article was very interesting, because it discusses the harmful effects of photo manipulation pertaining to real life, focussing on the newsroom. The author discusses how photo manipulations occur in order to help defend a story or dismiss an opposing position, and even to create drama or draw interest fro the public. The author notes how it is more possible for photo manipulations to take place in big, complex newsrooms. She states how it is unethical to do so, and that photo manipulation when it pertains to news is unacceptable and does not follow ethical standards.
Lowrey, Wilson. "Normative Conflict in the Newsroom: The Case of Digital Photo Manipulation." Journal of Mass Media Ethics 18.2 (2003): 123. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 10 Nov. 2010.